Fake Assignments? What?
Yes, it's true. I have an idea. *gasp* What it entails is this = Basically, putting citations together is like a dissecting an alien for students. Maybe some would do better at the dissection, especially if the alien's brains look like the frogs we played with in high school Biology. Anyhow, it's a foreign freakin' concept to everyone but me, or so it seems. I think, and I assume, that students really DO know and COULD know how to maneuver these suckers if they had the pieces in front of them. They are sometimes too lazy *double gasp* to look for the pieces. So, what if the pieces came from their own heads AND they got to be CREATIVE with the pieces? Hmmm... It might work, and it might blow up at me, but I'm going to try *drum roll please* having the students create Fake Sources and, therefore, Fake Works Cited Pages. Yes. All related, of course, to their P2 Topics (in both classes - English 110 & English 120 - maybe?).
The assignment would require students to create 10 Fake Sources*:
1-An article of some kind (journal, magazine, newspaper).
2-A book.
3-A web site.
4- A web page within a web site.
5- Dictionary definition.
6- Personal interview.
7- TV show.
8- Movie.
9- Email message.
10- Map or Chart.
Point Breakdown: 3pts per correct source citation creation (30pts) + 5pts for placing it all alphabetical = 35pts.
*And I'll hand out an MLA/APA guide for this assignment too, but they can always use the "interwebs."
Recent Comments