August 10, 2007
-
Sure, I find it odd that some people (my significant other, for example) don’t want to have anything to do with “being online” as in having an email account which they regularly check, having a profile on MySpace or Facebook, etc… but after watching The Today Show this morning, I am thinking they may be a bit better off. There’s a site “out there” called Reputation Defender; if you google yourself and find an angry blog post (again, blogging gets a bad rap! Dang it!) about you or incriminating pics, the people on this site will contact them and ask them to remove it. Some wonder if this violates free speech (since those angry blogger should be able to say whatever they want, right?), etc… it’s all very interesting anyhow.
And… after searching for myself, I find some intriguing things (must-reads!)… “A Role For Blogs in Graduate Education” by Kristine Blair, The Effects of Blogging Knowledge by Lisa Ede, An Introduction to Using Blogs as Content in the Writing Classroom, with an Examination of Issues Ranging from Audience to Remediation (have I read this yet?) by Barclay Barrios, “Writers are not born, they are blogged.” Or are they? What teachers say, what research says” by Nichole Converse Livengood, Blogical Construction (a blog about blogging) by Laura Blankenship, … most of it extends from the Blogosphere article which is pretty cool.
Oooh, and one site regarding my participation in the Fargo Marathon’s 5K this last May.
Comments (4)
Free speech doesn’t mean you can say anything you want. You can’t say things that are false, that are defamatory, and/or that injure others. You can’t yell “fire” in a crowded theater, for example, if there’s not really a fire because (a) it’s false and (b) people might get trampled to death. A newspaper could be sued for libel for printing defamatory, false content; a speaker could be sued for slander if they falsely defamed you. Libel laws can be applied to blogs because they’re published. The person can be sued only if what they’re saying is untrue AND damaging to your reputation. That doesn’t interfere with free speech at all.
Thank you for your input, yet…
What’s the difference between someone’s opinion & stating something that is “damaging to [my] reputation”? Example: ratemyprofessor.com has comments from students that are damaging to my reputation, yet they are students’ opinions (anonymous ones at that). That isn’t a blog, but it’s a piece of information “out there” that is linked to me (popped up on Google).
I found myself doing a google search. Not a good thing, as I am such a rabid right winger, trying to make a living in sales in a very left wing city. I also ran into some over the top mean words about me.
Warming do not google yourself unless you have very thick skin.
My search results weren’t so bad.
I can handle the ratemyprofessors comments since, well, it was just two students out of the 100s I’ve had… and the only other “bad” thing I found was a blog entry from an acquaintance I know about how I argued how to pronounce some literary person’s name.
Yea, you do need thick skin though.